Historic Bill Seeks to Give States Greater Control Over Policing Amid Rising Insecurity
Nigeria may be on the verge of the most significant security reform since independence following the passage of a constitutional amendment bill by the Senate that seeks to establish state police services across the federation. The proposed legislation would fundamentally alter Nigeria’s centralized policing structure by granting states greater authority over law enforcement and allowing governors to appoint state commissioners of police under a constitutionally regulated framework.
Grow your business with us
The reform comes against the backdrop of worsening security challenges across the country, including terrorism, banditry, kidnapping, farmer-herder conflicts, separatist violence, and organized criminal activities that have stretched federal security agencies beyond their operational limits. Supporters of the legislation argue that the current centralized policing model has proven inadequate for a country as vast and diverse as Nigeria, where security threats vary significantly from one region to another.
Under the proposed framework, the existing Nigeria Police Force would operate alongside newly established State Police Services. While the Federal Police would retain responsibility for national security matters such as counterterrorism, border security, organized crime, and inter-state criminal investigations, state police formations would focus on local law enforcement, intelligence gathering, crime prevention, and community security.
The bill, formally transmitted to the National Assembly by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu as part of his administration’s broader security sector reforms, is widely regarded as a response to growing public frustration over recurring mass kidnappings, attacks on rural communities, and prolonged insecurity in several states.
One of the most consequential provisions of the amendment empowers state governors to appoint Commissioners of Police for their respective state police services, subject to constitutional safeguards and oversight mechanisms. Senate leaders insist that extensive provisions have been inserted into the bill to prevent abuse of state police powers by political office holders. These include restrictions on arbitrary arrests, politically motivated investigations, and the use of police forces against opposition figures or dissenting voices.
Senate Leader Opeyemi Bamidele stated during deliberations that the legislation was deliberately structured to address longstanding fears that governors might transform state police into political instruments. According to him, constitutional checks and balances have been incorporated to ensure accountability, professionalism, and respect for civil liberties.
Security experts believe the reform could improve response times, strengthen local intelligence networks, and create policing systems that are more familiar with the languages, cultures, and security realities of individual communities. Analysts note that governors are currently regarded as chief security officers of their states but possess little direct operational control over federal police formations deployed within their territories.
Nevertheless, critics remain cautious. Some civil society organizations warn that without strong oversight institutions, state police forces could be vulnerable to political interference, ethnic bias, and uneven operational standards across the federation. Questions also remain regarding funding, recruitment standards, training capacity, and coordination between federal and state law enforcement agencies.
The constitutional amendment still requires approval by at least two-thirds of Nigeria’s State Houses of Assembly before it can become law. Should it secure nationwide ratification, the reform would represent one of the most far-reaching restructurings of Nigeria’s security architecture in decades.